> I may gave missed it, what is the reasoning of > -
> '__pairs'/'__ipairs' metamethod over __next? Is __next viewed as the
> "raw" iterator?
Yes.
-- Roberto
I urge you to consider my proposal for __next (see mailing list post with subject " __pairs isn't what we need" )
If you are against a __next though, a way for C to respect proxy tables is very much required. Not sure how you would solve this, as there is no lua_pairs...
