[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Lua registry, environment, and threads.
- From: Alexander Gladysh <agladysh@...>
- Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 17:10:26 +0300
> Maybe I missed something, but if the choice is between switching on a
> compatibility flag that makes the new 'in ... do ... end' construct pretty
> unusable (see Mike's example) or switching it off and make all old code
> using 'module()' unusable... I'd prefer having no compatiblity flag at all,
I second this.
Actually, I'd, personally, prefer compatibility flags to be off by
default. LUA_COMPAT_VARARG, enabled by default bites me often.
> and maybe call it 6.0 instead of 5.2.
I'm not sure this is necessary. Changes I've heard of are, IMHO, still
in range (on Lua scale) for minor version increment.
Alexander.
- References:
- Re: Lua registry, environment, and threads., Roberto Ierusalimschy
- Re: Lua registry, environment, and threads., Roberto Ierusalimschy
- Re: Lua registry, environment, and threads., Mark Hamburg
- Re: Lua registry, environment, and threads., Patrick Donnelly
- Re: Lua registry, environment, and threads., Roberto Ierusalimschy
- Re: Lua registry, environment, and threads., Mike Pall
- Re: Lua registry, environment, and threads., Roberto Ierusalimschy
- Re: Lua registry, environment, and threads., Mike Pall
- Re: Lua registry, environment, and threads., Roberto Ierusalimschy
- Re: Lua registry, environment, and threads., Enrico Tassi