[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Lua registry, environment, and threads.
- From: Petite Abeille <petite.abeille@...>
- Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 07:29:33 +0100
On Jan 8, 2010, at 12:10 AM, Paul Moore wrote:
> I thought "in" was lexical, so that the names in Test would *not* be
> looked up in anEnvironment. You seem to be assuming that "in" uses
> dynamic scope.
Right, this is indeed my assumption, i.e. a dynamic scope much akin to, well, get/setfenv... Pure speculation though :)
If it's not, then, well, hmmm, I'm a bit at a loss about the usefulness of that mysterious new "in" clause. Oh, well... will see how this pans out once more details leak out of Rio.
- References:
- Lua registry, environment, and threads., Christian Tellefsen
- Re: Lua registry, environment, and threads., Patrick Donnelly
- Re: Lua registry, environment, and threads., Roberto Ierusalimschy
- Re: Lua registry, environment, and threads., Christian Tellefsen
- Re: Lua registry, environment, and threads., Roberto Ierusalimschy
- Re: Lua registry, environment, and threads., Mark Hamburg
- Re: Lua registry, environment, and threads., Patrick Donnelly
- Re: Lua registry, environment, and threads., Roberto Ierusalimschy
- Re: Lua registry, environment, and threads., Leo Razoumov
- Re: Lua registry, environment, and threads., Petite Abeille
- Re: Lua registry, environment, and threads., Paul Moore
