[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Deep __newindex on assignment?
- From: spir <denis.spir@...>
- Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2009 01:52:53 +0100
Tom N Harris dixit:
> The
> left-hand side is only binding the value to a key in a table.
Sure. But my pov is that, for the programmer, binding a new key (name) does not mean the same as changing the value bound to an existing one. Whatever the value(s). Mutable or not. (I'm not talking of creating or changing the values themselves, but of the symbols = <name:value> bindings.)
(more on this topic: http://spir.wikidot.com/create-vs-change)
Denis
________________________________
la vita e estrany
http://spir.wikidot.com/
- References:
- Deep __newindex on assignment?, Todd Berkebile
- Re: Deep __newindex on assignment?, Alexander Gladysh
- RE: Deep __newindex on assignment?, Todd Berkebile
- Re: Deep __newindex on assignment?, Peter Cawley
- RE: Deep __newindex on assignment?, Todd Berkebile
- Re: Deep __newindex on assignment?, spir
- Re: Deep __newindex on assignment?, Javier Guerra
- Re: Deep __newindex on assignment?, Tom N Harris
- Re: Deep __newindex on assignment?, spir
- Re: Deep __newindex on assignment?, Tom N Harris