[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: metatable transmission
- From: Mark Hamburg <mark@...>
- Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 17:01:57 -0800
On Dec 22, 2009, at 11:25 AM, Javier Guerra wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 2:16 PM, spir <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> Again: why aren't metamethods identified by name?
> you keep repeating this; but i really don't get what you mean. either
> you defined your request somewhere else and i missed it, or you think
> it's too obvious to state. but i _really_ don't have the faintest
> idea what this could mean.
I think what Denis is asking is why we can't just do things like put __tostring in the object/table itself and instead we have to put it in the metatable.
That would certainly make one-off object creation easier. I don't know what the performance impact would be in general and I don't know what the other considerations were that led to the current design.