Re: Binarytrees benchmark results

[Linker <linker.m.lin@...>]

On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 22:30, Mike Pall <mikelu-0912@mike.de> wrote:

But neither is a substitute for a bump allocator. Unfortunately,
using such an allocator implies the need for a moving GC. The
current Lua GC is non-moving. Revising this fundamental design
choice is very complicated while keeping the current Lua/C API.

I think that a moving GC is bad for CPU which has a multi-cache modern architecture . 

-- 
Regards,

Linker Lin
linker.m.lin@gmail.com