[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: Binarytrees benchmark results
- From: Linker <linker.m.lin@...>
- Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 23:43:58 +0800
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 22:30, Mike Pall <email@example.com>
But neither is a substitute for a bump allocator. Unfortunately,
using such an allocator implies the need for a moving GC. The
current Lua GC is non-moving. Revising this fundamental design
choice is very complicated while keeping the current Lua/C API.
I think that a moving GC is bad for CPU which has a multi-cache modern architecture .