lua-users home
lua-l archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

In some of our workloads, profiling result shows that lua + msvc8 could result in spending more than 80% execution time in *RtlReallocateHeap*. Google tcmalloc (both windows and linux version) and linux glibc are all fine. 

sagasw 写道:

Hi Linker,
I think you mean compiling the Lua with new malloc function. Why do you do it yourself? 


Well

http://sunxiunan.com
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 10:21 PM, Andrew Wilson <agrwagrw@gmail.com <mailto:agrwagrw@gmail.com>> wrote: 

    Hi Linker

    Lua for Windows, uses standard Lua binaries & community generated
    libraries & Scite enabled Lua editor/debugger. LfW project doesn't
    compile code, we aggregate existing libraries & make easy standalone
    Lua install package.

    Cheers
    Andrew

    On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 4:44 AM, Linker <linker.m.lin@gmail.com
    <mailto:linker.m.lin@gmail.com>> wrote:
    > On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 16:08, steve donovan
    <steve.j.donovan@gmail.com <mailto:steve.j.donovan@gmail.com>>
    > wrote:
    >>
    >> On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 9:53 AM, Linker <linker.m.lin@gmail.com
    <mailto:linker.m.lin@gmail.com>> wrote:
    >> > Could you build lfw with the dlmalloc?
    >> > It will make it faster.
    >>
    >> But by how much? And for what tasks?
    >
    > FYI
    > http://g.oswego.edu/dl/html/malloc.html
    > http://memoryallocators.com/research/allocators1.html
    >
    >
    > --
    > Regards,
    > Linker Lin
    > linker.m.lin@gmail.com <mailto:linker.m.lin@gmail.com>
    >