[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: Coroutines and Go
- From: Stephen Kellett <lua@...>
- Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 09:43:32 +0000
Jacques Chester wrote:
But shouldn't you really be counting the number of artificial languages
that are in common use?
I read a few years back that the number of artificial languages
has already surpassed the number of natural languages. Assuming
Because that is what you are comparing with for natural languages.
For example Cornish is a dead language and doesn't count towards the
total of natural languages. No one knows how to speak it any more.
I read somewhere that the people that study languages regard a language
as effectively dead if the population speaking that language drops below
a few thousand (I think it was 10,000) people. I guess they must make
exceptions for these rain forest tribes that have small populations but
a distinct language of their own.