[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE]: LuaSocket 2.0.3 RC2
- From: steve donovan <steve.j.donovan@...>
- Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 14:21:54 +0200
2009/11/4 Ignacio Burgueño <ignaciob@inconcertcc.com>:
> to have a socket relinquish its ownership and gaining access to an opaque
> identifier that is easily serializable (i.e. a number). Note that I'm not
> mentioning file descriptors. That identifier could be the fd but one must
> not rely on that.
A most sensible suggestion. There is always some raw underlying OS
handle involved, but for Windows it isn't a fd, and should not be
treated as such. So portability _and_ flexibility!
- References:
- [ANNOUNCE]: LuaSocket 2.0.3 RC2, Diego Nehab
- Re: [ANNOUNCE]: LuaSocket 2.0.3 RC2, Petite Abeille
- Re: [ANNOUNCE]: LuaSocket 2.0.3 RC2, Diego Nehab
- Re: [ANNOUNCE]: LuaSocket 2.0.3 RC2, Ignacio Burgueño
- Re: [ANNOUNCE]: LuaSocket 2.0.3 RC2, Joseph Stewart
- Re: [ANNOUNCE]: LuaSocket 2.0.3 RC2, Ignacio Burgueño
- Re: [ANNOUNCE]: LuaSocket 2.0.3 RC2, Sam Roberts
- Re: [ANNOUNCE]: LuaSocket 2.0.3 RC2, Diego Nehab
- Re: [ANNOUNCE]: LuaSocket 2.0.3 RC2, Jerome Vuarand
- Re: [ANNOUNCE]: LuaSocket 2.0.3 RC2, Ignacio Burgueño