[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: first class ':'
- From: Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo <lhf@...>
- Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 10:22:16 -0300
> You do need to increase the stack level, but I think that David meant
> some method to make the extra stack level(s) invisible to the debug
> API.
This can be done in the traceback function itself, can't it?
I mean, just scan backward and skip your "hidden" functions.
Of course, you'll need a way to mark those: add them to a table or
name them with a predefined prefix.
- References:
- Re: Regarding the name 'pairs', TNHarris
- Re: Regarding the name 'pairs', Miles Bader
- Re: Regarding the name 'pairs', Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
- Re: Regarding the name 'pairs', steve donovan
- Re: Regarding the name 'pairs', Roberto Ierusalimschy
- Re: first class ':', froese
- Re: first class ':', David Manura
- Re: first class ':', David Manura
- Re: first class ':', Tony Finch
- Re: first class ':', Peter Cawley