Re: Is a Lua system easily embeddable?

[KHMan <keinhong@...>]

Andre de Leiradella wrote:
> KHMan wrote:
> > [snip]
> > I'm glad that there are solutions being offered like the Makefile 
> > converter, instead of just yakking and yakking like what I am doing. 
> > :-) What would be really useful right now is some sample 
> > implementation of bundling complex modules that integrates nicely into 
> > the original module's codebase. Then again, the sample solution might 
> > be perfect for party X but party Y might jump up and vehemently 
> > disagree. And we'll be back to square one... :-)
>
> [snip]
> That way, both parties (people that builds monolithic Lua platforms i.e. 
> for embedded devices and people on desktops) will be allowed in the, 
> huh, party.

Arf, don't mind me, my talk is very cheap. Since my position in 
this is roughly neutral, I'm just here in this thread for the 
kicks. :-)

I believe most people would agree that more flexible build options 
is a plus. The much harder problem is getting it done. Who's going 
to do it? What you really need now is a cunning plan[1]...

Good luck.

. . .

[1] Not trying to be disrespectful, this is a rather obvious 
reference to a British BBC series, for those who did not get it

--
Cheers,
Kein-Hong Man (esq.)
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia