Re: Unexpected table.remove behaviour.

[Enrico Colombini <erix@...>]

lostgallifreyan wrote:
> Suppose you have a LONG table full of several thousand NMEA 
> sentences or whatever.. If you need to thin data in place
> according to some rule, you need table.remove().
> But if you use ipairs() you work forwards from index 1.

I'm not sure I'd use a simple flat table in a case like this. Maybe a 
linked list or some other structure could be more appropriate, depending 
on the frequency of operations and their relative cost.

  Enrico