[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: [ANN] source code optimizer - function inlining
- From: KHMan <keinhong@...>
- Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 11:46:51 +0800
Olivier Hamel wrote:
David Manura wrote:
I stand corrected. :) Thanks for the info, I'd've thought it be the
other way around really. I'm not too sure having it emit bytecode is a
good idea since it breaks the second you move the byte code around.
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 11:25 AM, Philippe Lhoste wrote:
On 15/05/2009 14:14, Olivier Hamel wrote:
Metalua resorts instead to writing its own bytecode generator.
Not all optimizations can be done using source-to-source
translation. We might want to bypass the Lua locals allocator, for
example. Good or bad (or complications galore) I dunno, but it's a
cute academic exercise. Still, a user might want the result in
source form, so I think there is a place for either kinds of output.
When I read this: "since it breaks the second you move the byte
code around." It's so vague, what does it mean anyway, exactly?
Kein-Hong Man (esq.)
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia