[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: lua socket packaging
- From: Wesley Smith <wesley.hoke@...>
- Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 15:57:58 -0700
it's what I found through googling:
http://www.tecgraf.puc-rio.br/~diego/professional/luasocket/old/luasocket-2.0-beta/home.html#download
Where do I get a more recent version?
thanks!
wes
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 3:55 PM, Diego Nehab <diego@tecgraf.puc-rio.br> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> Why in lua socket is there a totally different way to require modules
>> than the usual require("ftp")? I've just downloaded the 2.0 beta and
>> it has this following chunk:
>>
>> -- finds a lua library and returns the entrypoint
>> local function find(lib)
>> local path = LUA_PATH or os.getenv("LUA_PATH") or "?;?.lua"
>> local f, e1
>> for p in string.gfind(path, "[^;]+") do
>> local n = string.gsub(p, "%?", lib)
>> f, e1 = loadfile(n)
>> if f then break end
>> end
>> return f, e1
>> end
>>
>> -- new "require" function
>> function require(name)
>> if not _LOADED[name] then
>> local f = assert(find(name))
>> local m = {}
>> setmetatable(m, {__index = _G})
>> setfenv(f, m)
>> f()
>> _LOADED[name] = m
>> end
>> return _LOADED[name]
>> end
>>
>>
>> that has to be executed to properly "require" something like ftp. Is
>> there a reason for this? It seems overly complex when a simple
>> module("ftp") would suffice inside the ftp.lua script.
>
> Back in the old 2.0 beta days, Lua didn't have a good package
> system... Why are you using 2.0 beta anyway?
>
> Regards,
> Diego
>