Re: Can't get custom allocation function to work

[Ralph Hempel <rhempel@...>]

Martin C. Martin wrote:

> vector overloads [] so that (*mem)[0] equals storage[0], which is 
> exactly what you want the address of.

And that's why I should keep my fingers off the keyboard when
the conversation turns around C++.

Thanks for clearing that up, and the real problem is probably
the realloc operation that copies data from the old to the resized
data area.

Cheers, Ralph