[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [BUG]0/1=?
- From: Rob Kendrick <lua-l@...>
- Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 18:24:23 +0000
On Thu, 22 Jan 2009 18:21:48 +0000
Peter Cawley <lua@corsix.org> wrote:
> It's purely the behaviour of the Microsoft C runtime with [s]printf
> functions.
Yes, my point is I don't understand why that behaviour is desirable
over "inf".
B.
- References:
- [BUG]0/1=?, Linker
- Re: [BUG]0/1=?, Andy Armstrong
- Re: [BUG]0/1=?, David Kastrup
- Re: [BUG]0/1=?, Andy Armstrong
- Re: [BUG]0/1=?, Linker
- Re: [BUG]0/1=?, Peter Cawley
- Re: [BUG]0/1=?, Rob Kendrick
- Re: [BUG]0/1=?, Peter Cawley
- Re: [BUG]0/1=?, Rob Kendrick
- Re: [BUG]0/1=?, Peter Cawley
