Re: table.concat takes on unrope? (was Re: concat for ropes)

lua-l archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Subject: Re: table.concat takes on unrope? (was Re: concat for ropes)
From: Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo <lhf@...>
Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 17:55:13 -0200

> i wonder if it would be appropriate to make table.concat() be unrope().

In fact, that was the original motivation for that exercise: to see if
we could easily add support for ropes to table.concat. Alas, it turned
out it wasn't so easy...

Follow-Ups:
- Re: table.concat takes on unrope? (was Re: concat for ropes), Edwin Eyan Moragas

References:
- table.concat takes on unrope? (was Re: concat for ropes), Edwin Eyan Moragas

Prev by Date: Re: [patch] dynamically link liblua to luac
Next by Date: Re: [patch] dynamically link liblua to luac
Previous by thread: table.concat takes on unrope? (was Re: concat for ropes)
Next by thread: Re: table.concat takes on unrope? (was Re: concat for ropes)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread