|
Paul Sheer wrote:
> It's faster by a factor of 30 than addString of section > 11.6 of PIL > I hope this will encourage someone to do this properly at > some point. > [snip] Whoa... for performance, everybody uses table.concat. Have you benchmarked your function against table.concat?yes, 30x faster than addString
Read the question again... -- Cheers, Kein-Hong Man (esq.) Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia