Re: [Benchmark] Chain calls

["Alexander Gladysh" <agladysh@...>]

On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 3:05 PM, Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de> wrote:
>
> * Alexander Gladysh:
>
> > I guess that the cost of returning function is compensated by proper tail
> > recursion in the "chain" case, and that x1.09 slowdown of the "plain_chain"
> > case is that cost itself.
>
> I think you are probably measuring GETUPVAL performance.

I think, that does not explain the difference between "plain_chain"
and "plain" cases. I would, however, adjust my cases to cache function
locally and post updated results here.

Alexander.