[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: Lua licensing thoughts
- From: "Martin Schröder" <martin@...>
- Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 15:12:14 +0200
2008/10/3 Florian Weimer <email@example.com>:
>> 2008/10/1 Florian Weimer <firstname.lastname@example.org>:
>>> The FSF position with regard to some bytecode interpreters (Emacs, for
>>> instance) is that the GPL extends to the bytecode.
>> The GPL FAQ differs:
> Note that the first paragraph of the answer deals with interpreters
> which are GPLed and whose run-time environment is licensed more
> permissively. This is very rare. Emacs is not in this category.
So we have to look at two licenses: Interpreter and run-time
environment. The license for the interpreter shouldn't be a problem
(unless it's really weird). It's the environment's we have to care