Re: Yet another reason to crash with multiple Lua runtime?

[Shmuel Zeigerman <shmuz@...>]

Ross Berteig wrote:
> I suspect that someone really knowledgeable about the details of the 
> process loader could create a glue DLL named lua51.dll that forwards 
> back to the hosting executable, thus making it possible for a 
> require()'d module to link to the one and only copy of the Lua core.

[...]
> I would much rather see someone cleverer than I figure out how to do the 
> magical forward to the statically linked core.

Isn't this what you're talking about?
  http://lua-users.org/wiki/LuaProxyDll

--
Shmuel