Re: getF in lauxlib.c--why call feof?

[Daniel Stephens <daniel@...>]

Daniel Stephens wrote:
> but either way, if that's failing it's much more likely the fault of 
> the call to ungetc earlier that doesn't bother to check if c == EOF.
I'll retract that part of what I said, as I checked the documentation 
and ungetc has a very specific (and useful) outcome in that case.

(lua - still passes the Ctrl-D test with the feof test in getF removed tho)

Daniel.