Re: LNUM 2008 patch is ready :)

[Niklas Frykholm <niklas@...>]

> LNUM_FLOAT    Problematic. Math functions not ANSI C. Limited or no 
> support on Windows.
>                 The only benefit I see is less memory consumption on 
> embedded devices (speedwise, not much difference with 
> LNUM_DOUBLE+LNUM_INT32).
>                 Is anyone actually using 'float' currently, and what is 
> the main reason you do?

We're using float. Precision is good enough for our purposes and it 
saves memory, which also is important for us.

// Niklas