[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Is it worth making a patch?
- From: "steve donovan" <steve.j.donovan@...>
- Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 15:39:15 +0200
So '@width' is to be expanded as 'self.width'?
function __init(width, height, depth)
is of course exactly the same as
__init = function(self, width, height, depth)
self is fine; we know what it means, and can teach our editors to spit
it out with a keystroke ;)
steve d.
On Jan 23, 2008 3:33 PM, alex.mania@iinet.net.au
<alex.mania@iinet.net.au> wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> Just wondering if anyone else would be interested in a couple of the minor
> changes I've made to the Lua core,
> which essentially allows constructs like this:
>
> local Box = class{
> classname = "Box",
> inherits = Shape,
>
> function __init(width, height, depth)
> @width = width
> @height = height
> @depth = depth
> end
> }
>
> to be equivalent to:
>
> local Box = class{
> classname = "Box",
> inherits = Shape,
>
> __init = function(self, width, height, depth)
> self.width = width
> self.height = height
> self.depth = depth
> end
> }
>
> The @ symbol is not my idea, I believe there's macros that accomplish much
> the same thing.
>
> If everybody's happy as is / macros are fine then it saves me the trouble
> of learning how to use
> diff (it probably should be innate knowledge in any programmer.. most
> embarrassing) and posting
> it on the powerpatches page. =)
>
>