Re: Alternative (better?) __index implementation

[roberto@... (Roberto Ierusalimschy)]

> I've wanted a way to do this in Lightroom's class system. We optimize for
> the case where a class has no getters or setters, but most of the classes
> have them. The solution I'd been considering was to add an extra parameter
> to the index function giving the base table. I like Rici's solution,
> however.

Do you like or do you prefer Rici's solution? (If you prefer, why?)

-- Roberto