[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Lua is not skin deep
- From: Ketmar Dark <ketmar@...>
- Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 15:18:11 +0200
hello, "steve donovan" <steve.j.donovan@gmail.com>.
On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 14:54:42 +0200
"steve donovan" <steve.j.donovan@gmail.com> wrote:
> Consider this:
>
> def test()
> {
> a = 10
> if (a > 4) {
> print 'was larger'
> if (a > 6) {
> print 'larger than 6'
> if (a > 10) {
> print 'bonanza'
> } else if (a > 8) {
> print 'payola'
> } else {
> print 'bonus'
> }
> }
> }
> }
>
> After mucking around with a token filter for a few hours, I got this
> to compile correctly. It 'looks' like a bastardized JavaScript, but it
> actually is Lua. The semantics are the same, and the transformation
> was fairly simple (110 lines of Lua).
it's NOT Lua. it's bastardized Python vomiting JS.