Re: Bytecode converter

[Enrico Colombini <erix@...>]

Asko Kauppi wrote:
> "patched" means Enrico's local patch.  LNUM aka "integer patch" does not 
> need bytecode conversion since it fully supports both integer and 
> floating point numbers. It's just optimizing for the integer speed, 
> whereas Enrico's case is running entirely integers only (my guess).

You guessed correctly :-) I had a look at your (vastly more powerful and 
complex [pun intended]) LNUM patch but I preferred to stay with 
something that I can fully understand, since I'll be responsible for it 
(and I could have to explain it to others).

  Enrico