[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: RE: lua_newthread(), good way to keep the thread values?
- From: "Vijay Aswadhati" <vijay@...>
- Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 09:40:52 -0700
On Thursday, August 23, 2007 1:56 AM, Carsten Fuchs wrote:
> Hi Vijay,
> I did, but...
>> "A weak table can have weak keys, weak values, or both. A table
>> with weak keys allows the collection of its keys, but prevents
>> the collection of its values. A table with both weak keys and
>> weak values allows the collection of both keys and values. In
>> any case, if either the key or the value is collected, the
>> whole pair is removed from the table.
> ... if I understood the last statement correctly, I think that
> there still is a problem:
> If I have TableInRegistry have weak keys (but normal, i.e.
> non-weak, values), the key-value pairs can be collected ahead of
> time, because there are no other references to the keys (which
> are the "thread" objects that I want to anchor in the first
I think you are right. I have a vague memory of someone posting a
requirement similar to yours and how the list responded by saying
that one should use weak tables. May be you can do a search for
'weak key' in the list.
I think if it was user data then one can store a pointer to the user
data as both key and value in a weak keyed table. Then when the
value is set to null the GC should kick in. I will admit this is not
my turf - but I want to learn this stuff anyways; so I stuck my neck
out. Good luck with your project.