Re: __unm is a binary operator?

[Shmuel Zeigerman <shmuz@...>]

Wim Couwenberg wrote:
> I just noticed that the __unm metamethod is in fact called as a binary
> operator in 5.1 (the second operand being equal to the first).  Is
> this intentional?  The manual clearly describes __unm as a unary
> operator and does not mention this second operand.

There was a recent thread on the issue, though no answer was given:
http://lua-users.org/lists/lua-l/2007-07/threads.html#00203

--
Shmuel