[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: __unm is a binary operator?
- From: Shmuel Zeigerman <shmuz@...>
- Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 14:10:59 +0200
Wim Couwenberg wrote:
I just noticed that the __unm metamethod is in fact called as a binary
operator in 5.1 (the second operand being equal to the first). Is
this intentional? The manual clearly describes __unm as a unary
operator and does not mention this second operand.
There was a recent thread on the issue, though no answer was given: