[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: Problem matching on [.]
- From: Nick Gammon <nick@...>
- Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 10:36:05 +1000
On 15/05/2007, at 9:33 AM, Mark Edgar wrote:
This could be taken to be an error in PiL, since it disagrees with the
reference manual, which seems pretty clear on this:
"All classes %x described above may also be used as components in set.
All other characters in set represent themselves."
Ah I see the reference manual is clearer on this point. I did a quick
look in my (hard copy) book for a treatment of regular expressions,
but "regular expression" is not in the index. (I should have looked
Thanks for the clarification.