Re: oo notation

[Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo <lhf@...>]

> Would it be possible, I wonder, to add some sugar that allowed
> the notation "x = %d\n":format(123)? There is the precedent of
> letting literal strings lose the parentheses when they are a
> single argument to a function. I cannot see any ambiguities
> arising

Note that
	a=f
	"x = %d\n":format(123)
is parsed as
	a=f"x = %d\n":format(123)
which is probably not what you meant.
--lhf