Re: Complete SDL distro?

[L-28C <kixdemp@...>]

>> It would help if L-28C would describe, what exactly is "not
>> satisfying" about using it.  Maybe my contact info in the package is
>> outdated; this is where to reach me currently.
Hmm... I didn't try it, I just assumed it lacked support for it. Sorry 
about that, I underestimated your power.

> I think I have given up trying to get a straight answer or story from
> L-28C. I will be less responsive to his postings in the future. :-)
Trying to get a straight answer? What's that supposed to mean? My 
answers aren't straight? Please explain.

And as for my name, I don't really like giving my real one out (if 
someone wants to look me up for a job, they probably won't hire the 
creator of <real name>'s Virus Maker, will they? ;-)). I'll try to take 
off all references to it, but thanks for comparing it to SW's robots, it 
really makes me feel good. (Not really, but anyway.)

Kein-Hong Man wrote:
> Asko Kauppi wrote:
> > Thanks for the Wise words!  :)
> > LuaX has had SDL_gfx at least for two years or so.   No contributions 
> > needed there, as far as I would know.
>
> My mistake, as least, as far as my posting is concerned. :-) I looked in 
> ./Modules but did not look in ./Modules/SDL2 ...
>
> > It would help if L-28C would describe, what exactly is "not 
> > satisfying" about using it.  Maybe my contact info in the package is 
> > outdated; this is where to reach me currently.
>
> I think I have given up trying to get a straight answer or story from 
> L-28C. I will be less responsive to his postings in the future. :-)