Re: Standard Lua Library

["David Burgess" <dburgess@...>]

Natanael Copa wrote:
> * We could borrow a part of the apr API (just strip of the apr_ prefix).
> Reimplementing something already working and tested is much easier than
> re-engineer from scratch.
I am not sure the apr license allows this. It is LGPL, no?

> * There is no need to stress with implementing both Linux and Windows
> from the start. Windows is such a big platform so if we just get the API
> there and an initial Linux version, somebody will port it to windows.
> Just make sure the API makes it possible (avoid things like fork and
> posix specific things)
Yes, the API is all important. But I would vote for developing the two
concurrently.