[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: pentium woes, was: broken mailers
- From: Rici Lake <lua@...>
- Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 00:16:05 -0500
Oops, I forgot to say that edit was in lobject.h
On 25-Sep-06, at 12:10 AM, Rici Lake wrote:
Edit: add at line 64, in the Value union:
By the way, this issue also shows up on Lua 5.0.2. The difference is
that it shows up at different stack offsets. So you have to be really
careful when you're comparing naive benchmarks between 5.0.2 and 5.1;
the for loop itself (if that's what you're using) might be creating an
artificial slow-down in one or the other case.
