Re: pentium woes, was: broken mailers

[Rici Lake <lua@...>]

Oops, I forgot to say that edit was in lobject.h

On 25-Sep-06, at 12:10 AM, Rici Lake wrote:

> Edit: add at line 64, in the Value union:
By the way, this issue also shows up on Lua 5.0.2. The difference is 
that it shows up at different stack offsets. So you have to be really 
careful when you're comparing naive benchmarks between 5.0.2 and 5.1; 
the for loop itself (if that's what you're using) might be creating an 
artificial slow-down in one or the other case.