Re: announce full fledged unicode support

["Adam D. Moss" <adam@...>]

Klaus Ripke wrote:
> > or slicker solution?
> ?
> what's it you don't like or are missing?

Oh, nothing, but that doesn't mean that there can't
be a slicker solution that appeared since then. :)

> > This looks attractive but I never had cause to try it.
> meaning you don't need unicode?

I've been happy enough with the coverage of ISO-8859-1 but
it's becoming time to think about expanding...

--adam