Re: request for interest/participants: another lua C++ binding

[Oliver Schoenborn <oliver.schoenborn@...>]

Matt Campbell wrote:
> Hello Olver:
>
> Your sample code looks nice, except for one fundamental problem.  It 
> assumes either a single, global Lua state, or something less portable 
> such as thread-local storage (which I use in my current Windows-only 
> project).
>
> I would suggest adding "LuaInterpreter& L" as the first argument to 
> registered functions, and changing the current global utility 
> functions such as luaReturn to LuaInterpreter methods.  This way, your 
> C++ binding framework would support multiple Lua states in a portable 
> way.
Yes, an important consideration, and there are ways to "keep it out of 
the way" but make it available if necessary (see next post). Thanks for 
the feedback.
Oliver