[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Fwd: Re: ANN: LuaJIT 1.1.0
- From: therandthem <therandthem@...>
- Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 09:55:32 -0800 (PST)
The simple answer is that LuaJIT will be very fast
compared to other VM implementations. No one will be
embarassed at a party for using Lua.
On october 15, 2005 Mike Pall wrote:
As of the time of this writing the score for Lua was
15.31. A properly compiled Lua 5.0 (not the Debian
shared library version) would get a score of 17.82.
Lua 5.1-alpha would get 18.02.
LuaJIT 1.0.3 would get around 24.04. Java scores 17.06
and GCC scores 25.54. ;-)
But note that GCC, Java, Python and Perl suffer badly
from unimplemented or not working benchmarks.
Realistically their scores would be higher. But it is
my belief that the overall ranking would still be:
Perl < Python < Lua < Java < LuaJIT < GCC
--- Paul Chiusano <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 12:24:58 -0500
> From: "Paul Chiusano" <email@example.com>
> To: "Lua list" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> Subject: Re: ANN: LuaJIT 1.1.0
> What are your future plans for LuaJIT, and how fast
> do you think a
> just-in-time compiler for Lua could be?
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around