[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: tables
- From: Gunnar Zötl <gz@...>
- Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2006 19:55:30 +0100
>> would be convenient (and consistent) if the # operator
>> provided the following behaviour (this is the assertion):
>> "# provides the same number as the number of iterations
>> provided by ipairs".
CW> Convenient maybe, but also more expensive. The current # implementation
CW> is O(log(N)) where N is the number of entries in the array part. The
plus, it would change the semantics of the # operator such that the
expression t[#t+1]==nil would not necessarily be true any more.