Re: 5.1 beta problem linking luac against .so

["Adam D. Moss" <adam@...>]

Mike Pall wrote:
> But your best bet is to link luac statically and avoid all the
> hassle. We are talking about 150K -- this is 1/1.000.000 of the
> average size harddisk sold nowadays.

A minor datapoint - luac compiles to under 68K here.

On a tangent, Mike, are you waiting for the final 5.1 release
before issuing a LuaJIT update?  With the Coco/old-glibc problem
avoided I was very impressed at the stability of LuaJIT 1.0.3
and was hoping to make it my 'standard' Lua for developing
against before too long.

Cheers,
--Adam
--
Adam D. Moss   -   adam@gimp.org