RE: [OT] Are you using tolua or tolua++?

["Nick Trout" <nick@...>]

I stand corrected (thanks Scott and Rafael). It looks like SWIG does
indeed have a new Lua binding.

It looks like it should work with Lua 5.0. It also looks like it has a
couple of nice extensions, like it std::vector, std::string, exception
handling.

Mmmm. This is interesting. This means that existing packages that
support SWIG could possibly be exposed to Lua "quite" easily. Writing a
comprehensive binding generator for SWIG is no small feat. Cheers to
author Mark Gossage (email ad given in docs).

Nick

P.S. Oh, and I just found this one as well, CPB. Looks like it use .net
CLI introspection to "bridge" Lua and a .net CLR language.

	http://www.thomasandamy.com/projects/CPB/


> -----Original Message-----
> From: lua-bounces@bazar2.conectiva.com.br [mailto:lua-
> bounces@bazar2.conectiva.com.br] On Behalf Of scott
> Sent: Monday, October 17, 2005 8:49 PM
> To: Lua list
> Subject: Re: [OT] Are you using tolua or tolua++?
> 
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 08:38:39PM -0700, Nick Trout wrote:
> >
> > SWIG doesn't work with Lua (since 3.2 I think).
> >
> > Nick
> >
> 
> I have no first-hand experience with SWIG but I do note this entry on
the
> homepage at http://www.swig.org/
> 
> "2005/10/09  SWIG-1.3.26 has been released. Lua, CLISP and Common Lisp
> with
> UFFI join the list of supported languages."
> 
> So it looks like Lua may be available. (again?)
> 
> scott
> 
> --
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
> scott jacobs
scott+lua@escherichia.net
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------