[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: Packaging and importing
- From: Rici Lake <lua@...>
- Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 16:03:54 -0500
On 15-Aug-05, at 3:30 PM, Diego Nehab wrote:
People would still write
socket = require"socket"
local socket = require"socket"
Not if all the examples they saw had the second construction, I suspect.
I like Mark's idea of autoloading modules for the stand-alone
interpreter, for what it's worth.
Question: should we start recommending that people use require for
standard libraries, too? :
local math = require "math"
I'd personally like to move in that direction...