[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: syntax heresy
- From: Boyko Bantchev <boykobb@...>
- Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2005 00:10:23 +0300
Thanks for the pointers you provide. I'll have a look at
them some time soon, I hope. But where I mentioned
`relevant work' I really meant relevant work for Lua. Sorry
for being not enough specific. I just had the impression
that other people have attempted similar things for Lua,
so I was curious what they were. Anyway...
As for `the other camp', where you belong, I know you
have your arguments and I respect (and even share some
of) them. So, let me say once more, I am _not_ trying to
convert anyone, although, of course, I still prefer going my
Moreover, I suspect there will always be these two camps.
And perhaps this is for good.
On 8/12/05, Uli Kusterer <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> ...something this extreme in the "concise" end of the scale...
I don't get the meaning of the quotes above, but as for being
extreme ... well, that is slightly exagerated, I guess.
Please take a look here:
(links to J), and here:
(a link to K), and also here:
(plenty of examples, mostly in K).
You might want to reconsider your opinion on the extremities.
And, please note, J and K are not at all toy languages.
Finally, since you are a fan of the wordy languages, you will
be probably delighted to see: