[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Handling deprecated features..?
- From: Mike Pall <mikelu-0508@...>
- Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2005 03:14:14 +0200
Hi,
Roberto Ierusalimschy wrote:
> That seems nice. A simple scheme would be simply a function call
> like compatmode5_0() or something like that.
Well, if 'simple' can cut it.
Python has a fairly elaborate scheme with forwards and backwards
compatibility, deprecation warnings and 'from __future__ import'
and whatnot. Well, you may ask ... what's wrong with it?
I have three different Python versions plus a complete copy of
its huge library installed. Because this or that program or
library just doesn't like this or that version. And I have
absolutely no clue (and no intention to find out) what breaks
when I delete one of them.
Ok, so now you need to support an elaborate compatibility scheme
_and_ you need to have different versions on disk. Dang.
BTW: I think I can install around 100 copies of Lua in the space
needed for one copy of Python. Way to go.
> (e.g., compatmode5_0("longstrings") would set compatibility only
> for long strings/comments...)
Well, there's a chicken-and-egg problem with this one. The parser
bails out before you can run the chunk to tell the parser that
it shouldn't (and a global flag doesn't cut it).
Bye,
Mike