Re: #s semantics (was Re: Lua 5.1-work6 cumulative PATCH #1)

[Rici Lake <lua@...>]

On 3-Aug-05, at 6:31 PM, Mark Hamburg wrote:

> But I find it odd to allow length to get redefined for tables and not 
> for
> strings and there seemed to be a strong consensus for not redefining 
> it for
> strings. So, I was looking for a way to make it consistent.

It is consistent with allowing + to be defined for tables but not for 
numbers. I guess that's why I don't find it weird that # should be 
(re)definable for tables but not for strings.