Re: changes in 'require'

[Roberto Ierusalimschy <roberto@...>]

> I agree its simpler. However, now every successful require pays the
> price of trying all its ancestors, even if none were found. I don't
> know how bad that will be.

First rule of optimization: don't do it :) You are proposing something
that you recognize as more complex just to optimize something you have
no idea whether it needs optimization...

-- Roberto