[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: socket.url (was Re: changes in 'require')
- From: PA <petite.abeille@...>
- Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2005 23:15:07 +0200
On Jul 08, 2005, at 22:41, Mike Pall wrote:
But any user of "socket.url" is likely to use the "socket"
functionality, too. It's a bit pointless to resolve URLs back
and forth without doing some kind of network access, right?
Well, one could argue that there is more to URIs than just plain
network access (e.g. data, file, tag, urn, etc...).
In any case, I personally find URIs to be useful enough in their own
right to deserve independence from LuaSocket :))
Here is an implementation based on Diego's LuaSocket URL:
http://dev.alt.textdrive.com/file/LW/LWURI.lua
Cheers
--
PA, Onnay Equitursay
http://alt.textdrive.com/