[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: FLTK?
- From: "Dean \"Sessile\" Davis" <sessile@...>
- Date: Sat, 02 Jul 2005 11:48:20 -0400
Enrico Tassi scribed the following on 7/2/2005 10:42 AM:
> Since the first time I've used LUA I felt that having bindings for a
> light toolkit would be a great thing.
>
> I've seen wx, iup, and fox. They are nice, but I think they are huge.
>
> Thinking at the memory consumption and the binary dimension of a LUA
> interpreter I think the best choice is FLTK. I'm not an FLTK guru and
> I've never used them in a real project, but AFAIK they are small and
> portable across Unix, Win and OSX.
>
> Does anyone agree with me? Is there a small toolkit for LUA I've missed?
> Is someone interested in binding FLTK-2 to LUA-5?
>
> ciao
It might be amusing for someone to wrap/embed Otk - Open Tool Kit
http://otk.sourceforge.net/
It's certainly not huge.
--
Dean.
