Re: Implementation of %

[Chris Marrin <chris@...>]

Gavin Wraith wrote:
> ...
> One might also argue that by keeping them different the programmer can
> choose which one he wants. Mathematicians want remainders that are
> always positive, whatever the sign of the arguments. The fact that
> programming language implementers have been getting it wrong for
> nearly half a century is not a good argument for sticking with the
> status quo. Haskell provides both alternatives, so Lua would be in
> respectable company if it too decided to keep both.

But remember that, if you choose '%' you are also choosing the higher 
performance path, so you have two unseparable variables in your choice. 
And it seems that compatibility with C, C++, Java, Javascript, Python 
and Perl is a pretty compelling argument for having it behave like 
math.mod()!

--
chris marrin                ,""$,
chris@marrin.com          b`    $                             ,,.
                        mP     b'                            , 1$'
        ,.`           ,b`    ,`                              :$$'
     ,|`             mP    ,`                                       ,mm
   ,b"              b"   ,`            ,mm      m$$    ,m         ,`P$$
  m$`             ,b`  .` ,mm        ,'|$P   ,|"1$`  ,b$P       ,`  :$1
 b$`             ,$: :,`` |$$      ,`   $$` ,|` ,$$,,`"$$     .`    :$|
b$|            _m$`,:`    :$1   ,`     ,$Pm|`    `    :$$,..;"'     |$:
P$b,      _;b$$b$1"       |$$ ,`      ,$$"             ``'          $$
 ```"```'"    `"`         `""`        ""`                          ,P`
"As a general rule,don't solve puzzles that open portals to Hell"'