[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: lua51 instead of lua? (fink, debian, gentoo et.al)
- From: Daniel Silverstone <dsilvers@...>
- Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2005 16:45:00 +0100
On Fri, 2005-04-22 at 16:30 +0300, Asko Kauppi wrote:
> Currently, all Lua package distributions I know simply create 'lua'
> (and 'luac') binaries, possibly libraries, too.
> What happens if you end up needing two separate versions? Choose
> either. But this could easily be fixed by using 'lua51', 'luac51' etc.
> command names instead of the common one. Then, there wouldn't be any
> clash and users could pick & use Lua as they please.
>
dsilvers@stupor:~$ dpkg -L lua50 lua40 | grep bin/lua
/usr/bin/lua50
/usr/bin/luac50
/usr/bin/lua40
/usr/bin/luac40
Looks like Debian and Ubuntu put them in there.
D.
--
Daniel Silverstone http://www.digital-scurf.org/
PGP mail accepted and encouraged. Key Id: 2BC8 4016 2068 7895
