[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: [ANN] LuaBinaries
- From: "Adam D. Moss" <adam@...>
- Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2005 14:35:37 +0100
Roberto Ierusalimschy wrote:
On POSIX systems with ELF (or similar) binary formats I compile
everything into a single 'lua' executable that is made with -Wl,-E
(or equivalents). Loadable modules depend on symbols from the
So, another poll: in Unix systems, should the standard makefile
create static libraries (.a)? Does anyone still needs the standard
liblua.a/liblualib.a files? Maybe the standard makefile could create
only the 'lua' executable...
On Linux and win32 I use the static libraries, and only the static
libraries. And yes, I use the standard makefile to make them.
Adam D. Moss - firstname.lastname@example.org